Assessment of a Pilot Memory Tool




Goodman, Jeffrey
Bright, Jocelyn
Kreitler, Crystal
Brewer, Steven

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title



Research indicates that individuals are poor with memory recall, especially after time passage (Potter, Staub, Rado, & O'Connor, 2002). The current research piloted a vignette to establish reliability for the memory assessment to assist the investigators with future research. Two time conditions were evaluated. Results revealed significant differences between Time 1 and Time 2 responses and intraclass coefficients showed high reliability between two decoders. Method One hundred twenty-three (80 females, 42 males) undergraduate students voluntarily participated for course extra credit. Course membership assigned participants to one of the two Time 1 groups—immediate response (n=67) and 15 minute response (n=56). Participants were asked to read the vignette for one and a half minutes, recalling details according to the assigned time condition. Participants provided a Time 2, seven day, recollection response (n=104). Two Graduate Students appraised the Accuracy of free-recalled written responses. The interrater reliability coefficients obtained for Time 1 (Accuracy) and Time 2 (Accuracy) fields were .99 and .99. Results Memory recollection was analyzed using a repeated measures 2 (Time 1 vs Time 2) x 2 between measures (0 minutes vs 15 minutes) mixed factorial ANOVA. A significant main effect was obtained, F(1, 91) = 64.54, p < .01. Participants reported less memory accuracy for Time 2 (M = 4.64, SD = 3.08) versus Time 1 (M = 6.66, SD = 3.75). Conclusion Results supported the expectation of a significant difference in memory recollection between Time 1 and Time 2. The tool revealed strong reliability between raters.



Assessment, Memory Tool, Pilot Memory Tool, Memory, Memory Recall, Vignette